Immigration Reform & Human Rights for the 21st Century 

Facebook Twitter Gplus Pinterest LinkedIn YouTube RSS
Facebook Twitter Gplus Pinterest LinkedIn YouTube RSS

The United States Supreme Court sets an April 25 date for oral argument on Arizona’s immigration law, Senate Bill 1070.

« Back to Events
This event has passed.
Event:
The United States Supreme Court sets an April 25 date for oral argument on Arizona’s immigration law, Senate Bill 1070.
Start:
2012/04/25 08:00
End:
2012/04/25 17:00
Cost:
Free
Category:
Updated:
2012/02/04
Address:
Google Map
DC, United States

The U.S. Department of Justice challenged the law before it went into effect in 2010, and a U.S. District Court judge in Phoenix imposed an injunction preventing several portions of the law from going into effect. The U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the injunction, and Gov. Jan Brewer petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court.

SB 1070 states that the intent of the law is attrition through enforcement, to deter the unlawful entry and presence of illegal immigrants in Arizona.

U.S. District Court Judge Susan Bolton’s injunction stopped four parts of the law:

The portion that requires an officer to make a reasonable attempt to determine the immigration status of a person stopped, detained or arrested if there’s reasonable suspicion that person is in the country illegally. This portion also requires law enforcement to check the immigration status of people arrested and hold them indefinitely until the status is determined.

The portion that creates a crime of failure to apply for or carry “alien-registration papers.”

The portion that allows for a warrantless arrest of a person in which there is probable cause to believe the individual committed a public offense that makes him or her removable from the U.S.

The portion that makes it a crime for illegal immigrants to solicit, apply for or perform work.

Whatever opinion the court issues will likely affect immigration laws in other states as well.

Recommended Immigration Resource

Immigration Lawyer Los Angeles

What’s New

Polls

Shawna Forde has been convicted of the murder of Brisenia & Raul Flores, what should the sentence be?

  • Death by lethal injection (85%, 3,591 Votes)
  • Life in Prison with no possibility of parole (14%, 579 Votes)
  • Life with possibility of parole after 25 years (1%, 58 Votes)

Total Voters: 4,228

Loading ... Loading ...

Recent Comments Etc.

Powered by Disqus

Keyword Search

Albert Gaxiola ALIPAC Arivaca Arizona Arivaca Az Arivaca murders Arizona Arpaio Border Patrol Border vigilantes Brisenia Flores CBP Chuck Stonex David Hartley Dream Act F.A.I.R. Falcon Lake illegal immigration Immigration Reform Jason Bush JD Hayworth Jeff Schwilk Jim Gilchrist Joe Arpaio JT Ready Laine Lawless Los Zetas Lou Dobbs MAD MCDC Minuteman Shawna Forde Minutemen Nativists neo nazis Pima County racial profiling Racism Raul Flores SB-1070 SDMM Sergio Adrian Hernandez Güereca Shawna Forde tea baggers Tiffany Hartley William Gheen Willy Gheen
  1. We welcome any feedback, questions, comments or requests to advertise on Immigration Clearinghouse