More agencies see the folly of 287(g), drop certifications | Immigration Clearinghouse

More agencies see the folly of 287(g), drop certifications

ICE & DHS on October 3rd, 2009 2 Comments
Members of the Brazilian immigrant community and others can rest easy with the withdrawal of the Framingham (Ma) PD and Barnstable County from the ICE program known as 287(g) Photo is of one of Sheriff Joe Arpaio's terror squads in Maricopa County Arizona

Members of the Brazilian immigrant community and others can rest easy with the withdrawal of the Framingham (Ma) PD and Barnstable County from the ICE program known as 287(g) Photo is of one of Sheriff Joe Arpaio's terror squads in Maricopa County Arizona

Two Massachusetts law enforcement agencies have announced that they are no longer enrolled in a controversial program that allows them enforce federal immigration laws.

The Framingham police and the Barnstable County sheriff’s department announced Thursday they were withdrawing from the federal program immigrant advocates said deterred immigrants from reporting crimes.

Framingham Chief Steven Carl said he was withdrawing because federal officials pressured the department to broaden its enforcement. He said federal officials wanted his department to detain immigrants, transport them and even testify in immigration court.

Police say that could alienate an already reticent immigrant community.

“We want them to report crimes,” said Police Chief Steven Carl. “We want them to call us when they’re victims. We don’t want them to be afraid of us. If we participated in the full (program), they’d be terrified of us.”

ICE’s wish would also have stretched an already understaffed department and cost a cash-strapped town more money, Carl said yesterday.

The original memo of understanding allowed Framingham Police to tap into a database to help investigate violent crimes.

Police spokesman Lt. Paul Shastany acknowledges the department has been caught in the middle of a debate on immigration enforcement. Some say the police are doing too much, others charge they’re not doing enough.

That division was reflected in the community as the news of Framingham dropping out of the federal program broke late yesterday.

Vera Dias Freitas, a local leader in the Brazilian community, said it is “wise that Framingham is pulling out of the program.”

“The reality is the existence of immigrants is everywhere,” she said. “What needs to be done is immigration reform where people are able to find a pathway to citizenship. No one wants to be living in the shadows. We should be looking for ways to support such reform.”

Tags: , ,

2 Responses to “More agencies see the folly of 287(g), drop certifications”

  1. Rodrigo Macedo says:

    leaving in Framingham for over 12 years, i can call it MY HOME, but i still fighting for my rights to become legal in this country……
    im brazilian by birth and American by choice,
    MAY GOD BLESS AMERICA AND ALL THOSE WHO LIVE HERE!!!!!!!!!!

    • Advocate says:

      Welcome Rodrigo and much luck in your endeavors. Keep in the mind that that would kick you and keep you down are a minority in this country.

      Buen suerte y gracias por su commentario

Leave a Reply

By submitting a comment here you grant this site a perpetual license to reproduce your words and name/web site in attribution. In addition, under the conditions of the FAIR USE NOTICE, The material used on Immigration Clearinghouse may be copyrighted material, and the use of it on Immigration Clearinghouse.org may not have been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available on a non-profit basis for educational and discussion purposes only. We believe this constitutes a ‘FAIR USE’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in 17 USC § 107. For more information go to: <url>http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml</url> If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘FAIR USE’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. Additionally, we reserve to moderate, edit or delete any comments which are designed to be slanderous, libelous or a deliberate attack against the character of the sites owners. Debate is good. Personal attacks will not be tolerated.