Jan 25

One woman’s story who was there for the event.

January 20, 2009 was a day of rewriting and redefining possibilities in America. It was a day of triumph and celebration, of sacrifice and tears. A beautiful black family, full of love and no stranger to hard times, will enter the history books as 44th President of the United States, Barack Obama, begins his journey as Head of State.
I initially did not want to go to the inauguration. I planned to go to D.C. the day before to see good friends who live in the city and reunite with college friends; but watching Obama enter office didn’t really lodge into my brain as something to do. When I told a friend of mine over the phone my plans for MLK Monday (and my non-existent plans for the next day), she was pissed at me.

“You’d come up here to visit your friends, but you don’t want to see history?!”

“Well,” I replied, “when you put it that way… nope.”

“Girl, you’d better get your head right. If you want to stay with me while you’re here, let me know.”

“I’ll think about it,” I smirked.

“I can’t believe you!”

After we disconnected I noticed a lot of emails and tweets to meet up with fellow bloggers while in D.C. or in Baltimore, and I became more and more turned off. I am not a social butterfly, and I felt fearful that I would make poor company. I shut myself away from all the solicitations until the Sunday before inaugural. Sunday changed everything.
My grandmother was still in rehabilitation at the time (she’s home now, and able to walk and climb steps moderately well). I went to visit her along with my mother, and she was waiting patiently for live concert coverage from the Lincoln Memorial. We watched Anderson Cooper interview a black family from New Orleans, and then she decided she wanted to sit in her wheelchair.

After three minutes and refusing assistance, she made her way from the bed to her wheelchair with confidence. She faced me and asked if I planned to watch inauguration.

Ignoring my mother’s glare, I told her I had been thinking about going. I told her I planned to see friends Monday, and a friend offered to let me stay at her place Tuesday. “I guess it would be a good thing to see…”

She smiled and agreed. “It would be good. I remember when Dr. King came to Detroit, and I left your mom and the kids with George [my grandfather] and went to see him. He appeared before a packed arena, and the overflow crowd sat outside on the ground to hear him. You could hear a pin drop while his voice came in through the speakers.” My smile matched hers. “I would not stay away. Young people always had to take to the streets. It was dangerous, crowded — sure — but you couldn’t keep them away.”

I nodded. Going to D.C. Tuesday was looking more appealing. The subject shifted to portion control and weight loss and, inevitably, to history.

My grandmother started describing a day in the cotton fields as a little girl growing up in the South, in the late 1930s/early 1940s. The truck drove around to the different houses, picking up workers to pick cotton all day, around 7 a.m. Before leaving, you always had a big breakfast because you’d spend most of the day burning it off.

If you were a kid, you received a bag about 5 feet wide and 10 feet long. Made of burlap, canvas — a thick, heavy material — and you’d have the strap wrapped around your shoulder and chest. There were no such things as break times; often a man would ride around on a horse and make sure everyone continued to work. If you stopped, you didn’t get paid.

Sometimes you got lucky: the cotton plants would grow high, and you wouldn’t have to bend over to pick it. Sometimes you weren’t so lucky, and you’d work on your knees from sun-up to sundown. The worst days were the days where the dew would coat the cotton plants and the field, with low-growing crops. You’d have to wade your way through the mud, feeling it squish beneath your knees. When the midday sun hit, you had the chance to wipe it off your pants as it dried.

Midday sun above your head — noon — was also the clarion call to lunch. How lunch operated depended on whose field you worked that day. Some fields had general stores, where you could buy Vienna sausages, pork and beans, sardines and eat them within the half-hour window before hitting the fields again. Others would have nice owners whose wives and children would ask the cook to prepare something small for the workers on the field. After you ate, you resumed picking cotton until the sun went down. Pay collected for the household, truck drops you home.

With a smile, my grandmother said, “You don’t really recognize history as you living it; it’s only after you think about it… of course we could eat heavier meals! We weren’t sitting still all of the time.” I smiled and nodded, and she told me about the process they took for washing clothes before the washing machine.

Thank God for Whirlpool. You know how sometimes people minimize the fact that women of color often serve as washing women and cleaning ladies for middle- to upper-class families, as if vacuums and Swiffers and Whirlpool and Tide were around forever? Well, let’s just say for washing and ironing clothes alone, there were more than 20 different steps to the process — including retrieving wood for a fire and water for the washtub and cleaning pot. My grandmother outlined every step, and those steps went for every piece of clothing, from the small handkerchiefs to the heavy handmade quilts. My eyes began to glaze over. Clearly I would have been the dirty, embarrassing family member. (No, I wouldn’t have. Slovenliness wasn’t allowed back then, especially not under my great- and great-great grandmothers’ watches.)

My grandmother lived to cook and eat delicious homegrown and homemade feasts, to literally burn the midnight oil with her kerosene lamp while in school, to sit outside and listen to King speak. My grandmother scrapbooked black firsts — like the first black pilot to own and fly his plane. My grandmother, understandably, is overrun with Obama paraphrenalia because she was absolutely delighted to live to see the first black president. A big first, and a very memorable one.

So nothing could keep me from D.C. by that point. I traveled via the MARC commuter train from Baltimore that Monday. I very nearly missed my train, in fact. Huge lines clogged the Amtrak ticket window — but luckily, I was one of the brave souls who could use the kiosk for a quick purchase. I hit D.C. a little before noon, and spent a great day exploring Georgetown and DuPont Circle with my college friends. Huge pizza slices, splurging on Belgian and Swiss Truffles (great for side orders of depression post-Inaugural, let me tell you what), and laughing as my friends hovered around the Big Penis Book at Lambda Rising (an excellent LGBTQQI book haven) — we had so much fun.

Also on that day, a 420 marijuana legalization and pro-Bush impeachment group hosted a huge to-do in the middle of Dupont Circle, to wishing Bush a fond farewell. Or, should I say, Bushnocchio. A variety of different shoes rested at ol’ Dubya’s feet. I threw a few (and may have missed and hit actual people in the crowd — sorry!) and my friends started up a rousing cheer of “na na na na, na na na na, hey hey hey, goodbye!”

obama_inaugThe cameraman filming the shoe throwing event thought we were American Idol quality and taped us singing it, telling us that there were plans to send the footage overseas. I may be more than net famous, y’all! And believe me, there’s no better feeling than clipping a faux-Bush on the shoulder with a clog. After that event, I realized we were not only there to welcome our first black president, but also to say farewell to one of the worst misunderestimated jackasses in history. I knew by that point I’d made the right decision about coming.

You don’t recognize history until after you’ve lived it.

Read the rest of this wonderful story……..

Tagged with:
Jan 23

Bush’s Parting Shot: Kiss my Ass!

By Uncategorized Comments Off

New America Media, Commentary, Roberto Dr. Cintli Rodriguez,

bushfingerTUCSON, Ariz. — On his last full day in office, ex-president Bush chose to commute the sentences of ex-border patrol officers Ignacio Ramos and Jose Compean. They had been convicted of shooting a Mexican man in the buttocks, covering up the evidence and lying about the shooting. The shooting took place as Osvaldo Aldrete Davila was fleeing across the border into Mexico near El Paso, Texas.

With a stroke of his pen, Bush gave the Mexican and migrant community a message: “Besar me culo.” The controversial commutations were ripe with symbolism. They took place hours before Bush went back to Texas and hours before President Barack Obama was sworn in.
Continue reading »

Tagged with:
Jan 01

Nativist Leader's Racist Past Exposed

Nativist Leader's Racist Past Exposed

The Republican Party is in disarray after its loss to Barack Obama, and on the sidelines white nationalists are skillfully preparing political attacks on the new American president.

Since the weeks leading up to the most significant elections ever to take place in the United States, federal law enforcement agencies, the media and human rights organizations have paid close attention to threats made against Presidential-Elect Barack Obama. Some of these threats have been made by individuals with ties to the neo-Nazi movement in the United States.

During the Democratic National Convention in August police in Denver, Colorado detained three individuals after a weapon, drugs and wigs were discovered in their possession. The individuals, eventually released, were described as white supremacists. Two months later two racist skinheads were arrested in Tennessee after law enforcement uncovered their plans to behead black Americans and assassinate Barack Obama.

According to the Chicago Tribune there have been at least 200 hate incidents directed at Obama and his supporters. Some of these incidents have included cross burnings. A tactic historically used by the Ku Klux Klan to intimidate blacks.

However it is beyond the graffiti, intimidation, and harassment that the far right is building its true power. With Republican leadership engaged in an internal power struggle to control the party apparatus, extremist factions within the party are seeking to strengthen their influence while more extreme external organizations hope that the current political vacuum will allow them to increase the influence of white nationalism in the American body politic.

While some factions like The Eagle’s Forum, The National Rifle Association, and Team America Political Action Committee have entered the politically charged minefield to control the Republican Party, other organizations like The Constitution Party, John Birch Society and the overtly anti-Semitic American Free Press hope that they will be able to create a third alternative to the current two party system. Regardless of the differences, what each faction shares is the belief that waging political attacks against President Obama will allow them to both undermine the incoming administration and grow their membership.

Political attacks on Obama began immediately after the last vote was cast. On December 1st and again on the 3rd a group called We the People Foundation ran full page ads in the Chicago Tribune questioning Obama’s citizenship. By law an American president is required to be born on U.S. territory and We the People Foundation (run by Robert Shultz) hoped to raise doubt regarding the right of Obama to be president. What the Chicago Tribune failed to point out when they ran the ads was that Shultz, a long time far right tax protester, bases his anti-tax theory on the belief that as a “free white sovereign male” he is not required to pay income tax. Shultz also argues that the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution is illegal.

Perhaps the nastiest of these were spawned by Jerome Corsi and others at World Net Daily who has been relentless in trying to disrupt the next administration with their baseless claims of citizenship of President Elect Obama

This particular attack on Obama is part of a larger tendency within the American far right to dismantle the 14th Amendment to the United States Constitution. Brought into law after the American Civil War, the 14th Amendment defined legal citizenship for those born in the United States. This was a major blow against white supremacy after the Civil War because it superseded race, religion and ethnicity as the basis of citizenship.

Under the guise of “controlling immigration”, the far right Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR), the most influential anti-immigrant group in the United States, has stated publicly that one of its top goals for the next federal legislative session is to restrict the 14th Amendment.

FAIR and other anti immigrant “Hate Groiups” such as ALIPAC.us (listed by ADL as hate based group

The Federation for American Immigration Reform was founded by John Tanton, a conservationist and retired ophthalmologist. FAIR has received 1.2 million dollars (U.S.) from the “racial science” foundation the Pioneer Fund. FAIR has many associations with political extremists including white nationalists.

InThe Tanton Files, Nativist Leader’s Racist Past Exposed just released by the Southern Poverty Law Center, proof is presented of the racist nature of the immigration debate being driven by this man, and happily picked up and promoted by anti immigrant nativists such as William Gheen of ALIPAC.us. Although in all fairness, FAIR cut ties with Gheen’s organization some time ago because Gheen’s idea’s for population control and immigration reform were too far out in right field, even for a nativist organization such as FAIR.

Bob Dane the spokesperson for FAIR told the newspaper Sacramento Bee that “To deal with this tidal wave of human beings coming across the border, repealing the 14th Amendment would be an effective tool.” In reality, far from curbing immigration ending the 14th Amendment would effectively reverse major gains of the black civil rights and women’s rights.

While FAIR prepares to fuel bigotry by attacking immigrants and civil rights the National Rifle Association (NRA) has sought to sow fear and suspicion of a multi-racial democracy amongst whites by claiming that Obama has plans to pass laws that will allow the government to confiscate their guns.

While these rumors are completely unfounded it has served to grow the ranks of the NRA. It has also vastly increased the sale of guns and ammunition since the election in the neighborhoods of white America where neo-Nazi and Ku Klux Klan organizations litter the streets with leaflets whispering of imminent “race war.”

Unsurprisingly hate violence is on the rise according to the Leadership Conference on Civil Rights. The victims—Jewish, black, homosexual, and immigrant—are innocents in an environment created by white nationalists out to undermine the Obama presidency at any cost. A successful black presidency undercuts the bigoted arguments of white nationalists and affirms the possibility of a multiracial civil society—one where “the content of a person’s character means more than the color of their skin.”

Tagged with:
Dec 26

Getting Immigration Right for a Change

By Uncategorized Comments Off

Barak ObamaIt’s way too early to tell whether the United States under President-elect Barack Obama will restore realism, sanity and lawfulness to its immigration system. But it’s never too early to hope, and the stars seem to be lining up, at least among his cabinet nominees.

If Mr. Obama’s team is confirmed, the country will have a homeland security secretary, Janet Napolitano of Arizona, and a commerce secretary, Bill Richardson of New Mexico, who understand the border region and share a well-informed disdain for foolish, inadequate enforcement schemes like the Bush administration’s border fence. And it will have a labor secretary, Hilda Solis of California, who, as a state senator and congresswoman, has built a reputation as a staunch defender of immigrants and workers.

The confluence of immigrants and labor is exactly what this country — particularly, and disastrously, the Bush administration — has not been able to figure out.

In simplest terms, what Ms. Solis and Mr. Obama seem to know in their gut is this: If you uphold workers’ rights, even for those here illegally, you uphold them for all working Americans. If you ignore and undercut the rights of illegal immigrants, you encourage the exploitation that erodes working conditions and job security everywhere. In a time of economic darkness, the stability and dignity of the work force are especially vital.

This is why it is so important to reverse the Bush administration’s immigration tactics, which for years have attacked the problem upside down and backward. To appease Republican nativists, it lavished scarce resources solely on hunting down and punishing illegal immigrants. Its campaign of raids, detentions and border fencing was a moral failure. Among other things, it terrorized and broke apart families and led to some gruesome deaths in shoddy prisons. It mocked the American tradition of welcoming and assimilating immigrant workers.

But it also was a strategic failure because it did little or nothing to stem the illegal tide while creating the very conditions under which the off-the-books economy can thrive. Illegal immigrant workers are deterred from forming unions. And without a path to legalization and under the threat of a relentless enforcement-only regime, they cannot assert their rights.

It’s a system that the grubbiest and shabbiest industries and business owners — think of the hellish slaughterhouse in Postville, Iowa, running with immigrant child labor — could not have designed better. Through it all, the Bush administration’s response to criticism has been ever more enforcement.

Ms. Solis, whose father immigrated from Mexico and was a Teamsters shop steward and whose mother, from Nicaragua, worked on an assembly line, promises a clean break from that past. She lives in El Monte, a Los Angeles suburb where two compelling stories of immigrants and labor have emerged in recent years.

The first was tragic: a notorious 1995 raid at a sweatshop where Thai workers were kept in slave conditions behind barbed wire. The second is less well-known but far more encouraging: a present-day hiring site for day laborers at the edge of a Home Depot parking lot. The Latino men who gather in that safe, well-run space uphold an informal minimum wage and protect one another from abusive contractors and wage thieves. It’s good for the store, its customers and the workers.

Ms. Solis is a defender of such sites and has opposed efforts in other cities to enact ordinances to disperse day laborers and force them underground. She understands that if day laborers end up in our suburbs, it is better to give them safe places to gather rather than allow an uncontrolled job bazaar to drive wages and working conditions down.

That’s a bit of local wisdom that deserves to take root in the federal government.

SOURCE:New York Times Editorial

Tagged with:
Dec 02

Change Immigrants and Labor Can Believe In

By Uncategorized Comments Off

President Elect Barak Obama

President Elect Barak Obama

Since 2001 the Bush administration has deported more than a million people–including 349,041 individuals in the fiscal year ending just prior to the election. It has resurrected the discredited community sweeps and factory raids of earlier eras, and started sending waves of migrants to privately run jails for crimes like inventing a Social Security number to get a job. Every day in Tucson seventy young people, including many teenagers, are brought before a federal judge in heavy chains and sentenced to prison because they walked across the border.

 It’s no wonder that Latinos, Asians and other communities with large immigrant populations voted for Barack Obama by huge margins. People want and expect a change. Ending the administration’s failed program of raids, jail time and deportations is at the top of the list. National demonstrations have called for a moratorium on raids since the summer, and one big reason why Los Angeles turned out so heavily for Obama was the anti-raid encampment and hunger strike in the Placita Olvera, which electrified the city.

But the raids program has been rejected by more than immigrants alone. The election took place as millions of people were losing their jobs and homes. Yet while Lou Dobbs and the talk show hysteria-mongers tried to scapegoat immigrants for this crisis (“What about illegal don’t you understand?”), most voters did not drink the Kool-Aid. In fact, every poll shows that a big majority reject raids and want basic rights and fair treatment for everyone, immigrants included. The political coalition that put Obama into office–African-Americans, Latinos, Asian-Americans, women and union families–expects change.
Continue reading »

Tagged with:
preload preload preload